© Jeffrey J Wolynski

A mineral is a solid, stable, ordered chemical that is repeating. A good example of a mineral is quartz, or SiO₂.

A rock is a group of minerals all together in an aggregate. A good example of a rock is granite, which is feldspar
(repeating unit) KAlSi₃O₈ or NaAlSi₃O₈ or CaAl₂Si₂O₈ , quartz, and biotite K(Mg,Fe)
3(AlSi
3O
10)(F,OH)
2 (mica) (all minerals).

Look at all those. Establishment physics/geology/geophysics wants people to believe that those elements just squeezed together because of gravity. I'm sorry. Elements don't just squeeze together to make molecules, they need to be ionized! That is the only way to get their structures to intermingle. Think about it like this: You have a bunch of strangers at a party, do you just shove them all into a corner of the room and expect them to start talking and interacting? Will they stay together? Probably not. You have to get some alcohol in them first (ionize them)!

In establishment physics and geology/geophysics there is nothing (I've been looking for over 3 years now) that states how exactly quartz grows, or how any combination of rock formed while the Earth was forming. Think about this for a second reader. How did the elements combine to form minerals to begin with? Were not all the elements inside of rocks at first separate? Rocks were *as is* in outer space and then just fit together like a trillion piece 3 dimensional puzzle? What would convince neutral gas to combine to form rocks? Would it not just remain a gas?

These kind of questions are damning to establishment physics and their assumptions. Establishment will throw these kind of questions under the bus. They are threatening reader! How dare a regular Joe like myself ask razor-like questions? I don't have the credentials to prove I know what I'm talking about after all!