© Lloyd

1. http://milesmathis.com/waals.pdf - I have shown recently that the ideal gas laws were fudged to match data at standard temperature and pressure (STP), so of course to match a wider range of temperatures, they would have to be fudged in many other ways.
2. This is where we get Keesom forces, Debye forces, the London dispersion force, and a host of other pushes and finesses in math and theory.
3. Even though much of new physics is statistical, they always forget to apply probabilities to their confirmations, by asking themselves if the standing interpretation is the most probable match to the new direct measurement.
4. We have never been told exactly how the Pauli Exclusion Principle prevents the collapse of molecules.
5. The electron simply doesn't have the energy to repel incoming molecules.
6. As my readers know, it isn't tiny electrons that provide this molecular exclusion they are talking about.
7. It is the recycled charge field.
8. The nucleus is emitting a heavy charge field of real photons, and these photons repel large intruders like molecules.
9. Two nuclei are held at a distance by charge field structures, and these structures are dependent on the nuclear structures present.
10. But since I have shown that electron orbital bonding was dead on arrival, contradicting its own field definitions, we know that van der Waals forces are all DOA for the same reason.
11. Not only are there no electron bonds, there are no electron orbitals, no PEP, and no electron wavefunction.
12. I have already proved that the wavefunction has to be given to the photons, not the electrons, so nothing will stand.
13. Now let us look at number 2, or the Keesom forces.
14. When ions are involved, they pretty much admit this is a charge force.
15. I have shown that the charge field is actually Maxwell's displacement field, which underlies and drives the E/M field.
16. Keesom forces are always charge forces, whether we are dealing with ions or not.
17. The multipole interactions prove that, since what they are trying to do there is match the charge profile of my diagrammed nucleus, which is taking in charge at the poles and emitting it via the carousel level (see diagram of Argon below).
18. This creates a sort of quadrapole.
19. In many cases, that will give us not a quadrapole or octopole, but a hexapole.
20. All elements in the molecules are recycling this real field of real photons, and the field is really traveling physically between the molecules.
21. In my theory, the field potentials δ are caused by real charge field densities and directions.
22. Now number 3, the Debye force.
23. This is defined as an attraction between a permanent multipole on one molecule and an induced multipole on another.
24. This force is not far wrong in some ways, except again in its field assignment.
25. Once more, they explain the polar nature of the molecules in terms of electrons being attracted or repelled by ends of a molecule.
26. This isn't the mechanism.
27. The mechanism is again charge field structures.
28. Molecules are more charge balanced than ions or even elements, but they still have field potentials.
29. Current theory is correct in its explanation of induced poles, since one molecule can indeed induce field changes upon another molecule.
30. But this is done through the already existing charge channels.
31. These existing charge channels are natural outcomes of the nuclear structure, and cannot be induced past a certain point; but as we saw in bonding of elements, one element certainly can influence the structure of another.
32. Finally, number 4, London dispersion forces.
33. The LDF were thought to be necessary to explain molecules without permanent multipole moments.
34. However, my diagrams show us there is no such thing.
35. Since every element is polar, every molecule must be as well.
36. [Each particle is constantly spinning and so is each atom, so unbalanced proton/neutron structures are unstable.]
37. So here is my diagram of Argon:
38. Each blue disk represents an alpha, or two protons and two neutrons.
39. I have shown the noble gasses are nonreactive mainly because all those six outermost alphas are perpendicular to the external charge field.
40. It means that Argon is only relatively neutral, not completely neutral.
41. It maintains a small polarity, only due to its configuration.
42. Argon has a weak charge field, not a zero charge field.
43. We now know this is true of the noble gasses, since we have recently manufactured compounds with them.
44. If the noble gasses were completely nonpolar, they wouldn't have any working charge channels and couldn't be bonded in any circumstances.