|
|
AIR BUOYANCY
© Lloyd
- If there were really a ten tonne column of air above every square meter, nothing would rise no matter the density of it.
- There is a lot of air above you, but it doesn't weigh anything, as I have shown .
- It has no net vector down.
- It has mass, but that mass is resisted by charge.
- What is really happening is that the air has buoyancy.
- More velocity sideways in the field gives you more buoyancy per unit time, and this creates lift.
- But we still need to explain the buoyancy of the air.
- The air keeps the airplane up, but what keeps the air up?
- Why doesn't the air compress and collapse? Why doesn't it fall?
- We are told it is the kinetic energy of the air molecules, but that doesn't serve.
- Where does the kinetic energy come from?
- Is the heat from the Sun falling on the atmosphere enough to create the pressure we see?
- It isn't even close.
- If heat from the Sun or the temperature were the main factors, we would see the sky literally fall with a large drop in temperature, and we don't see that.
- We don't see the ionosphere collapsing in on the lower levels at the poles or in winter.
- We get a bit of that, but nothing like what we would expect if the pressure of fluids and gasses was determined by heat from the Sun.
- Same thing with the deep oceans, which are cold and dark.
- We know how fluids act, but we don't know why they act that way.
- The other problem is that our vector with both buoyancy and lift is up.
- Incompressibility and the old fluid mechanics don't really explain that.
- Since the atmosphere does have mass, there must be a vector up to keep it from falling.
- Yes, it would have a weight of 10 tonnes if that weight vector weren't matched by a vector up, and it should have a weight of 10 tonnes, according to the current theory.
- But it can't have an unresisted vector down of 10 tonnes or it would fall.
- Therefore, we must have a vector up to explain both the buoyant atmosphere and lift.
- That vector was unknown until now, but it is charge.
- The charge field has an acceleration up of .009545m/s^2.
- It will automatically lift anything with an acceleration down that is less than that, which is why smaller ions are lifted into the ionosphere.
- The charge photons just push them up there, by straight collisions.
- This is also what keeps the atmosphere up and the clouds up and so on.
- This is what causes atmospheric pressure, since as the photons keep the air up, they do so by collisions, and those collisions also keep the kinetic energy up.
- Fluids and gasses resist compression because they are full of charge.
- Charge resists compression.
- Charge creates the vector out that balances the pressure vector in.
- Charge also creates buoyancy and lift, because charge is moving up.
- There is a real vector up in the field before anything else is computed, which is what confused everyone from the beginning.
- … [Nitrogen and oxygen are buoyant on Earth.]
- … [R]eal photons [are] moving through the nuclei, and each photon has mass equivalence.
- Therefore, if nitrogen is recycling more photons per second than oxygen, then in some situations, those photons have to be counted as mass in the unified field.
- If they are counted, then nitrogen's unified field mass gains more than oxygen's unified field mass.
- I have shown that if we include charge, oxygen and nitrogen weigh very nearly the same.
- For gases to persist in the atmosphere over long periods of time, they have to be weightless, which means the unified field has to balance very nearly perfectly.
- To cause any measurable motion, the charge recycling differential would have to be on the order of 1000 or more, and elements and molecules don't have differentials like that.
- But when we are looking at gases in the atmosphere, which are levitated and therefore in unified field balance, we have to consider these small charge imbalances.
- Since any imbalance will cause a failure of levitation, we have to consider all imbalances, including the small imbalance of charge recycling.
- That is what I just did, showing it explains the unified field equality of nitrogen, oxygen, neon, and argon.
- What would it require to make CO2 balance?
- A stronger charge field or a weaker gravity field.
- Since CO2 is too heavy for the Earth, we need to lower the gravity field to balance it.
- Well, that is just what Venus has.
- Its gravity is .9 that of the Earth, which matches my math above.
- I showed that CO2 is 10% too heavy for the Earth, Venus has 10% less gravity, so Venus should have the perfect unified field to levitate CO2.
- We can use the same math on Mars.
- Mars has a gravity .376g.
- What gas has a weight 1/.376 that of argon?
- That would be an inert gas with a molecular weight of 106.4.
- Since there are no common gases that match that profile at Martian atmospheric temperatures, we have a simple explanation for Mars' tenuous atmosphere.
- Most of Mars' atmosphere is CO2, we are told, but on Mars it doesn't fall, it rises.
- We can see the plume behind Mars as its atmosphere is blown off into space.
- We are told the Solar Wind blows it off, but we now know that it would blow off even without the Solar Wind.
|