© Lloyd
  1. http://milesmathis.com/core.pdf (What Causes the Earth's Heat? Answer: CHARGE)
  2. how to calculate the Earth's heat straight from the fundamental charge
  3. Abstract: I will briefly critique the current theory of Earth's heat, including core theory and nebular theory.
  4. In a recent paper I confirmed for the third time that the charge field should peak in the infrared.
  5. *Infrared photons rising up from the Earth are indistinguishable from heat.
  6. Remember, the Earth has an overall density of only 5,515 kg/m^3, and the upper levels have a density of only around 3,000 kg/m^3.
  7. *If we add the high spin rate of the Earth, the centrifugal effect should force heat out from center very efficiently.
  8. The reason for this is that normal matter is not a heat barrier, no matter what it is made of.
  9. ANY natural material will transfer heat.
  10. There is no material naturally in the Earth that does not transfer heat across it.
  11. whatever is heating the Earth from within must constantly replenish the 10^31 Joules of energy we are finding.
  12. Beyond that, it will turn out that this existing radioactivity is due to an underlying cause, which means radioactivity is the root cause of 0% of the heat.
  13. *What I mean is that the "spontaneous" fission of these larger unstable [radioactive] elements will turn out to be not spontaneous at all, but due to the charge field.
  14. *It is the charge field that energizes neutrons in the Earth's interior, freeing them up to start fission and thereby radioactivity.
  15. I am able to predict this with confidence, because I know that the charge field is the cause of the Earth's heat, and it always has been.
  16. I now draw your attention to the diagram under title, which I borrowed legally from Wikipedia.
  17. it is direct proof of my charge theory.
  18. *Here we have a diagram taken straight from data (NOAA ERBE, 1985) that shows more longwave radiation at the equator and less at the poles.
  19. *The Earth is recycling charge and charge peaks in the infrared (infrared is longwave).
  20. Every particle and body in the universe — from the electron to the galaxy — is a charge reactor.
  21. I[n] most cases, it does this by spinning.
  22. A spinning sphere in a charge field immediately and naturally sets up charge potentials, and if that sphere is porous to charge, the charge comes in the poles and is emitted at the equator.
  23. Look at the hole at the south pole. Also look up "coronal hole."
  24. *Coronal holes are most often at the Solar poles, just like this.
  25. *This is where photons are going IN.
  26. In fact, I can now prove this assertion by calculating the total energy of the Earth straight from the fundamental charge.
  27. I just scale up from the fundamental charge and the proton, using the proton's known mass and my radius of the proton: 1e  1.602 x 10^-19C; 1C  2 x 10^-7 kg/s; 1e  3.204 x 10^-26 kg/s; ME/Mp  3.6 x 10^51 E; E  1.15 x 10^26 kg/s
  28. But now we need to write that as Joules, so we need a distance.
  29. It isn't enough, because we also need to consider charge density.
  30. We can do that by incorporating the density of our objects.
  31. The simplest way to do that is by incorporating the radius differential as well as the mass differential.
  32. So we will incorporate the radius differential while comparing it to the mass differential, to skip a step.
  33. The radius of the proton over its mass is Rp/Mp  4.09 x 10^-14/1.67 x 10^-27  2.45 x 10^13
  34. And for the Earth: 1/RE/ME  9.41 x 10^17
  35. So the differential is 38,381E; E  4.41 x 10^30 J/s
  36. Anyway, what this means physically is that the recycled charge has 38,381 time[s] further to go along the Earth's radius than the proton's radius, relative to the mass of each body.
  37. Or, if that doesn't make sense to you, think of it this way: although the charge field is the same at all levels, how much energy it produces is dependent on the amount of matter present.
  38. The Earth is basically 38,000 times denser to charge than the proton.
  39. So as charge moves through the Earth, it energizes 38,000 times as much matter per second as it does with a single proton.
  40. In calculating charge differentials, we don't need three dimensions anyway.
  41. We just let charge move down the radius, and compare the way it moves at the quantum level and the way it moves at the macro-level.
  42. As you see, I just calculated a heat content straight from charge.
  43. Since charge causes the heat, and since both can be written in terms of Joules, the energy I found can be applied to either one.
  44. *The total charge of the Earth IS its total heat content due to charge.
  45. *This also proves that the Earth must be radiating rather than trapping energy.
  46. http://milesmathis.com/heat.htm (WHAT IS HEAT? and why the Curie temperature?)
  47. [W]hen you add heat to a vessel, what are you adding?
  48. I will be told you are adding molecules that are already in motion, and that they transmit their motions to the molecules in the vessel.
  49. What is causing the motion or heat in the added molecules?
  50. Why are they hot to start with?
  51. The reason modern physics cannot answer this question is that they have never discovered the charge field.
  52. They know it exists, in that they give it little plusses and minuses when they explain electromagnetism; but they have never given it a real presence in the field.
  53. They explain charge as an exchange of information between charged particles, but they give the exchange field no reality.
  54. Charge is currently said to be transmitted by virtual or messenger photons, which have no mass, no spin, and no radius.
  55. In current theory, "real" photons are also virtual.
  56. *To explain heat and temperature sensibly, you must have a charge field that is real.
  57. *And in order to have a charge field that is real, you must give the photon mass, spin, and radius.
  58. In this way: Since photons are already traveling as fast as they can (at c), we cannot speed them up to increase motion or energy or temperature.
  59. We can only increase the number of photons in a given space.
  60. *So heat is photon density.
  61. *When you add heat to a vessel, you are adding photons.
  62. *Yes, you are also adding molecules or atoms or electrons or something, since that is the normal way to add photons; but as a matter of fundamental mechanics, the heat is caused at the primary level by the photons.
  63. I have shown in other papers that all matter is emitting charge photons.
  64. *Not only that, but all matter is recycling charge photons.
  65. *Therefore, the more matter you have in an area, the more charge photons you will have.
  66. It does not matter what the "charge" of the particle is (except for neutrons and other neutral particles, which trap the charge field, negating it).
  67. But, although all matter emits charge, some matter emits a lot more.
  68. The proton emits a lot more than the electron, for example, simply due to size.
  69. Atoms and molecules can also trap or block parts of the charge field, acting neutral or partially neutral.
  70. *We know that ions are charged particles, which, according to my theory, means they are recycling the charge field directly: they are taking it in and emitting it, with little or no blockage.
  71. So they can transfer their heat or motion to other particles via the charge photons.
  72. The charge photons carry energy across space from one particle to the other.
  73. *But in more complex groups like atoms and molecules, the charge field is not recycled in this way.
  74. *The charge field causes internal motion or heat or energy, but it is not re-emitted directly.
  75. *It is either trapped, like with a neutron, going back on itself and creating zero energy pockets, or it is spit out in directionalized streams, between particles.
  76. You don't have to collide with an ion to feel its energy, since the ion can transmit its energy via the charge photons it is emitting.
  77. But you do have to collide with a molecule or an atom to feel its heat or charge.
  78. That is an overview, but we know that both atoms and molecules can be "charged" in some limited ways.
  79. Magnetism is one such way.
  80. *But you can already see that heat is determined by the charge field.
  81. *It can be transmitted either by the charge photons directly, by collision with a photon; or by collision between larger particles.
  82. I have explained heat as the density of photons, which is not explaining heat by heat.
  83. It is explaining heat by density and motion.
  84. I cannot say why all photons go c, but taking c as a first postulate, I show that we can explain heat as a function of it.
  85. Up to a given temperature, the energy would add to the photon density, which would add to the leaking charge field, which would add to the felt magnetism.
  86. But at the same time, this extra photon density would be adding to the internal energy of the molecules.
  87. Unless the molecules were perfectly balanced, this internal energy would express itself as a wobble.
  88. *We may imagine that at the Curie temperature, this wobble becomes so exaggerated it destroys the path through which charge is leaking.
  89. The photons cannot get through the wobbling tunnel, and they are trapped.
  90. *The neutrality of the molecule is increased, and we say that it has lost magnetism.

← PREV Powered by Quick Disclosure Lite
© 2010~2021 SCS-INC.US