1. Pulsars emit beams of EM radiation. Stars shine in all directions evenly.
2. Stars outnumber pulsars by many hundreds of billions.
3. Pulsars' magnetic fields are 1 quadrillion the strength of stars.
4. Pulsars are a couple of miles in diameter. Stars are thousands of miles in diameter.
5. Pulsars are formed in supernova events, stars from z-pinches.
6. Pulsars resemble superconducting magnetic energy storage mechanisms, stars as large dissipative events.
7. Pulsars are embryonic galaxies, stars surround them like leaves on a tree.
8. Pulsar:Acorn::Galaxy:Oak Tree
I'm not going to read a book; a thread is long enough. Explain 5,6, and 7 more in depth. What is the process/order of events of this, ie, how does a pulsar come into being then birth a galaxy?
Sparky
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
I thought jefrey was going to give us a break.... ...
1. Pulsars emit beams of EM radiation. Stars shine in all directions evenly.
2. Stars outnumber pulsars by many hundreds of billions.
3. Pulsars' magnetic fields are 1 quadrillion the strength of stars.
4. Pulsars are a couple of miles in diameter. Stars are thousands of miles in diameter.
5. Pulsars are formed in supernova events, stars from z-pinches.
6. Pulsars resemble superconducting magnetic energy storage mechanisms, stars as large dissipative events.
7. Pulsars are embryonic galaxies, stars surround them like leaves on a tree.
8. Pulsar:Acorn::Galaxy:Oak Tree
I'm not going to read a book; a thread is long enough. Explain 5,6, and 7 more in depth. What is the process/order of events of this, ie, how does a pulsar come into being then birth a galaxy?
5. I need to work on some more. Reasons why I state this:
a. In stellar metamorphosis stars don't explode randomly because they are too "massive". That is gravitational mythology combined with wishful thinking. Safe to say its a sort of psychosis of establishment scientists on large scales. The Earth is 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons of rock. It ain't goin nowhere. Again, this is how the discovery was made, it is the differentiated end to a stars' evolution after all the matter in a star has mostly neutralized, leaving pockets of ionization in fluids such as magma and weather.
b. Also in stellar metamorphosis stars are not born from gravitation, being born from gravitation is self-contradictory, we have already discussed this. The events they are born under are going to be noticable, as it will take a considerably powerful event to make many quadrillions of tons of matter become ionized. Stellar birth is not a quiet event. It will be noticable and it will have one hell of a wow factor. Stars just don't slip into existence unnoticed, they make an entrance.
c. In stellar metamorphosis since stars cool and combine their elements into molecules and loose their magnetic fields, pulsars have to be some other event, because their magnetic fields are WILDLY VAST. 1 quadrillion gauss? As if the Earth had 1 quadrillion gauss...
d. As well I might have the processes backwards. Maybe a star is born from a supernova and a pulsar is the z-pinch, either way the events will be noticed. you just don't ionize quadrillions of tons of gas in deep space without anybody noticing.
Concerning #6
a. Being superconducting will allow it to exist for, well, for as long as the material is superconducting. Estimates for the lifetime of a persistent current can exceed the estimated lifetime of the universe, depending on the temperature according to the Big Bang believers, which in essence means they just shot themselves in their feet. As the universe itself operates via superconductivity, it is electrically perpetual. Contradictions are quite numerous in establishment scientism.
b. Dissipative events are the resistive strutures that give galaxies their appearance. The charge separation created by a dying pulsar just doesn't disappear, you have to combine it into solid structure and neutralize it. The most efficient shape for this neutralization process is a sphere. All material that conducts electricity will conduct heat as well, unless it is superconducting. Thus we are to expect the Sun to dissipate the majority of its energy via radiation as the charge starts neutralizing into gaseous structure. Thus the Sun will begin shrinking and become dimmer as the resistance dies down, and start to convect, producing much large convective currents which will make it flare. As well it will produce a core which will continue to facilitate the charge neutralization and dissipative loss from the formation event. (supernova or z-pinch).
Concerning #7
A. If we are to understand nature we must look at it. Just using math or saying "electricity" did it is not reality. It is fantasy. The best options for connecting the patterns mother nature has laid before us is to look around us. Trees are the best example. Halton Arp uses them himself, to him a quasar is ejected from a galaxy like an acorn falls from an oak tree and becomes a galaxy itself.
B. The quasar itself is not enough though because as a quasar stands as an object that is many hundreds of light years in diameter after it ejects from the galaxy. What about when the quasar was born? What does a baby quasar look like? What does the core look like when it was an embryonic galaxy? My best guess on that, or should I say hypothesis which fits inside of the General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis is that the Crab Nebula, or M1 is an embryonic galaxy. http://vixra.org/pdf/1310.0047v1.pdf
As an added note, since we have all been made aware of the black holes being fictional fantasies via Mr. Stephen Crothers, we must accurately determine the actual centers of galaxies. In GTSM the center of the Milky Way is J1745-2900, not a black hole. http://vixra.org/pdf/1308.0087v1.pdf
JeffreyW
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
According to establishment scientism they have found a "magnetar" at the heart of the Milky Way Galaxy.
They said it is sitting next to a "black hole" which it "feeds". This is patently a specific sort of establishment psychosis. There is no black hole. The magnetar j1745-2900 is the center of the Milky Way.
Sparky
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
We were calculating flux densities at 6 AM on Saturday morning and we could not believe that this magnetar had just turned on so bright,"
Suggesting that the current density had increased, as to EU model.
Neutron stars are supposed to be the answer to pulsar behavior. Pulsars are stars whose brightness fluctuates over a short time span. Pulsars are important to astrophysical models because they are used as measuring tools. Those with "known" distance, coupled with variations in their luminosity, are thought to be road markers in space, so that the distances to other stars can be determined.-----Another magnetic beast is known as a "magnetar". These are anomalous stars identified as X-ray pulsars (AXP) or soft gamma repeaters (SGR). They are said to be created by neutron stars with magnetic fields measuring over 10^15 Gauss.-----It is a well-established fact that magnetic fields are induced by electric currents. Therefore, there must be an electric current generating the intense fields in the magnetar. It is also indisputable that the feeder current must be part of a circuit, since persistent electric current must flow in a completed circuit.---------------The oscillations in magnetars (or pulsars, in general) are caused by resonant effects in electric circuits. The sudden release of stored electrical energy in a "double layer" is responsible for the occasional outburst of gamma rays. The outburst begins with a sudden peak of energy, and then declines gradually, like a stroke of lightning.--------------It seems more likely that magnetars and PWNs are immense concentrations of electricity focused by some kind of "plasma gun" phenomenon.
Charged particles (plasma) accelerated by electric currentsspiral in the resulting magnetic fields and shine in all high energy frequencies, extreme ultraviolet, X-rays, and sometimes gamma rays.-------------Galactic jets, toroids, and glowing clouds are all examples of electricity flowing through dusty plasma confined within Birkeland currents that stretch across the light years.
It is a principle of science that one should begin with the simple and then continue to the more complex if the situation warrants that step. 2 + 2 = 4 does not require algebraic equations to solve it. If the foundational precepts of Electric Universe theory, based on well-established, Nobel-vetted work by dedicated researchers in the physics of high-energy plasma provides concise, laboratory replicated answers to the puzzle of supernovae, then this writer (Stephen Smith) submits that that is the most logical place to begin an exploration.-------Classical electromagnetism is more than able to create the phenomena that Chandra observes, without recourse to the supernatural physics of SMBHs.
JeffreyW
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
Sparky wrote:
We were calculating flux densities at 6 AM on Saturday morning and we could not believe that this magnetar had just turned on so bright,"
Suggesting that the current density had increased, as to EU model.
Neutron stars are supposed to be the answer to pulsar behavior. Pulsars are stars whose brightness fluctuates over a short time span. Pulsars are important to astrophysical models because they are used as measuring tools. Those with "known" distance, coupled with variations in their luminosity, are thought to be road markers in space, so that the distances to other stars can be determined.-----Another magnetic beast is known as a "magnetar". These are anomalous stars identified as X-ray pulsars (AXP) or soft gamma repeaters (SGR). They are said to be created by neutron stars with magnetic fields measuring over 10^15 Gauss.-----It is a well-established fact that magnetic fields are induced by electric currents. Therefore, there must be an electric current generating the intense fields in the magnetar. It is also indisputable that the feeder current must be part of a circuit, since persistent electric current must flow in a completed circuit.---------------The oscillations in magnetars (or pulsars, in general) are caused by resonant effects in electric circuits. The sudden release of stored electrical energy in a "double layer" is responsible for the occasional outburst of gamma rays. The outburst begins with a sudden peak of energy, and then declines gradually, like a stroke of lightning.--------------It seems more likely that magnetars and PWNs are immense concentrations of electricity focused by some kind of "plasma gun" phenomenon.
Charged particles (plasma) accelerated by electric currentsspiral in the resulting magnetic fields and shine in all high energy frequencies, extreme ultraviolet, X-rays, and sometimes gamma rays.-------------Galactic jets, toroids, and glowing clouds are all examples of electricity flowing through dusty plasma confined within Birkeland currents that stretch across the light years.
It is a principle of science that one should begin with the simple and then continue to the more complex if the situation warrants that step. 2 + 2 = 4 does not require algebraic equations to solve it. If the foundational precepts of Electric Universe theory, based on well-established, Nobel-vetted work by dedicated researchers in the physics of high-energy plasma provides concise, laboratory replicated answers to the puzzle of supernovae, then this writer (Stephen Smith) submits that that is the most logical place to begin an exploration.-------Classical electromagnetism is more than able to create the phenomena that Chandra observes, without recourse to the supernatural physics of SMBHs.
No mention of superconductivity. Why? Shouldn't they be trying to explain why the electric current is persistent? Or does EU believe pulsars are powered from an outside source? Also why no mention of any elements? Hydrogen? Helium? Lithium? Silicon? Nitrogen?
Sparky
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
:( <moderator edit> jeffrey: "No mention of superconductivity. Why? Shouldn't they be trying to explain why the electric current is persistent? Or does EU believe pulsars are powered from an outside source? ...
This has been explained many times.
Deductive reasoninglinks premises with conclusions. If all premises are true, the terms are clear, and the rules of deductive logic are followed, then the conclusion reached is necessarily true.
:(<moderator edit> jeffrey: "No mention of superconductivity. Why? Shouldn't they be trying to explain why the electric current is persistent? Or does EU believe pulsars are powered from an outside source? ...
This has been explained many times.
Deductive reasoninglinks premises with conclusions. If all premises are true, the terms are clear, and the rules of deductive logic are followed, then the conclusion reached is necessarily true.
Am I suppost to respond to messages that start out with insults? Gosh, makes me wonder if the EU people are actually interested in science or name calling. Oh and it's Jeffrey, not jeffrey, you capitalize a personal pronoun regardless if its attached to an insult.
viscount aero
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
In EU theory in general assume everything is akin to a device plugged into the wall, powered from without. A star is a "toaster" plugged into the cosmic power grid.
JeffreyW
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
viscount aero wrote: In EU theory in general assume everything is akin to a device plugged into the wall, powered from without. A star is a "toaster" plugged into the cosmic power grid.
Excellent, now we are getting somewhere. I work in an electrical supply warehouse, so I am familiar with electrical equipment. Nothing works unless there is a generator producing the power from an external location (power station). In EU where are the power stations?
So there is no confusion:
1. In electrical grids you have
a. The source of power. b. The consumers of power which have loads of certain amps and voltages depending on the phase of the currents and applications. c. the mediums for the conduction of electrical current (copper, aluminum, etc)
Thus in EU:
a. Where are the sources of power? b. what are the consumers of power? c. what are the mediums between the sources of power and the consumers of power?
viscount aero
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
JeffreyW wrote:
viscount aero wrote: In EU theory in general assume everything is akin to a device plugged into the wall, powered from without. A star is a "toaster" plugged into the cosmic power grid.
Excellent, now we are getting somewhere. I work in an electrical supply warehouse, so I am familiar with electrical equipment. Nothing works unless there is a generator producing the power from an external location (power station). In EU where are the power stations?
So there is no confusion:
1. In electrical grids you have
a. The source of power. b. The consumers of power which have loads of certain amps and voltages depending on the phase of the currents and applications. c. the mediums for the conduction of electrical current (copper, aluminum, etc)
Thus in EU:
a. Where are the sources of power? b. what are the consumers of power? c. what are the mediums between the sources of power and the consumers of power?
You got it. It's a general rule of thumb in EU. Remember always: powered from outside/without. Not within. I'll address your other questions a bit later...
viscount aero
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
Greetings. My answers are in PURPLE:
JeffreyW wrote:
viscount aero wrote: In EU theory in general assume everything is akin to a device plugged into the wall, powered from without. A star is a "toaster" plugged into the cosmic power grid.
Excellent, now we are getting somewhere. I work in an electrical supply warehouse, so I am familiar with electrical equipment. Nothing works unless there is a generator producing the power from an external location (power station). In EU where are the power stations?
So there is no confusion:
1. In electrical grids you have
a. The source of power. b. The consumers of power which have loads of certain amps and voltages depending on the phase of the currents and applications. c. the mediums for the conduction of electrical current (copper, aluminum, etc)
You can say that the "wall outlet" is the power source that is the "galactic circuit," and in a macro scale the local "super-cluster/galactic circuit."
But what is powering this circuit? That is unknown. What is energy itself? Why is it here? Why does it manifest as EM phenomena? Why do transformers short out and explode? Why does lightning exist? What is "charge?" and why does it separate?
b. what are the consumers of power?
Good question. Those would be the solar systems with planets and sentient life forms, including the stars themselves as they are the "light bulbs" that are screwed into the socket. But also the stars are "nodes" of current density, akin to relays. In the EU model the Sun is the "anode" (think "A" for "positive") and the interstellar circuit is the "cathode."
I thought jefrey was going to give us a break....
...
Neutron stars are supposed to be the answer to pulsar behavior. Pulsars are stars whose brightness fluctuates over a short time span. Pulsars are important to astrophysical models because they are used as measuring tools. Those with "known" distance, coupled with variations in their luminosity, are thought to be road markers in space, so that the distances to other stars can be determined.-----Another magnetic beast is known as a "magnetar". These are anomalous stars identified as X-ray pulsars (AXP) or soft gamma repeaters (SGR). They are said to be created by neutron stars with magnetic fields measuring over 10^15 Gauss.-----It is a well-established fact that magnetic fields are induced by electric currents. Therefore, there must be an electric current generating the intense fields in the magnetar. It is also indisputable that the feeder current must be part of a circuit, since persistent electric current must flow in a completed circuit.---------------The oscillations in magnetars (or pulsars, in general) are caused by resonant effects in electric circuits. The sudden release of stored electrical energy in a "double layer" is responsible for the occasional outburst of gamma rays. The outburst begins with a sudden peak of energy, and then declines gradually, like a stroke of lightning.--------------It seems more likely that magnetars and PWNs are immense concentrations of electricity focused by some kind of "plasma gun" phenomenon.Charged particles (plasma) accelerated by electric currentsspiral in the resulting magnetic fields and shine in all high energy frequencies, extreme ultraviolet, X-rays, and sometimes gamma rays.-------------Galactic jets, toroids, and glowing clouds are all examples of electricity flowing through dusty plasma confined within Birkeland currents that stretch across the light years.It is a principle of science that one should begin with the simple and then continue to the more complex if the situation warrants that step. 2 + 2 = 4 does not require algebraic equations to solve it. If the foundational precepts of Electric Universe theory, based on well-established, Nobel-vetted work by dedicated researchers in the physics of high-energy plasma provides concise, laboratory replicated answers to the puzzle of supernovae, then this writer (Stephen Smith) submits that that is the most logical place to begin an exploration.-------Classical electromagnetism is more than able to create the phenomena that Chandra observes, without recourse to the supernatural physics of SMBHs.
