Your efforts are not going unnoticed. To the readers and subscribers of new ideas, please use discernment, my own ideas tend to be on the fringe and some are very much incorrect, it is up to you to determine what is sensible.
Great video.
I love the earth's oceanic current animations. Is that available on its own somewhere?
I saw them too. I have no idea. hahahha, I'm just in shock right now that someone would take it upon themselves to make a quick video. I am quite happy because of it and am feeling a great sense of relief. I don't want this understanding to die with me.
The member is clearly on this forum. They know of Charles Chandler.
Your efforts are not going unnoticed. To the readers and subscribers of new ideas, please use discernment, my own ideas tend to be on the fringe and some are very much incorrect, it is up to you to determine what is sensible.
Great video.
I love the earth's oceanic current animations. Is that available on its own somewhere?
I saw them too. I have no idea. hahahha, I'm just in shock right now that someone would take it upon themselves to make a quick video. I am quite happy because of it and am feeling a great sense of relief. I don't want this understanding to die with me.
The member is clearly on this forum. They know of Charles Chandler.
Mr. Chandler is probably one of the most important people during this revolution, and Mr. Telluric Current is aware of him. Clearly Mr. Current has the pulse of scientific progress under his/her fingers.
CharlesChandler
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
JeffreyW wrote: Mr. Chandler is probably one of the most important people during this revolution, and Mr. Telluric Current is aware of him. Clearly Mr. Current has the pulse of scientific progress under his/her fingers.
Thanks! So who is this guy (gal?), and where do we send the fruit basket? This is totally what we need. I wish i had the talent to do stuff like this, but alas, my process is too fine-grain. I know good presentations when I see them, but I don't know where to start writing them. But if we can get him/her in a one-on-one chat, we can supply enough ideas to keep him/her going indefinitely. Like I keep saying, this is all starting to come together. The coolest thing about it is that it is tangible — you can GET it. Existing science is obtuse, dark, and mysterious. What we're doing is accessible, and it makes you feel like you're connected to the cosmos, like you can now embrace the Universe as your home, because it has become clear to you. With high-quality videos of these ideas, the message will hit home. So Mr. Current, whoever you are, bravo!
JeffreyW
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
CharlesChandler wrote:
JeffreyW wrote: Mr. Chandler is probably one of the most important people during this revolution, and Mr. Telluric Current is aware of him. Clearly Mr. Current has the pulse of scientific progress under his/her fingers.
Thanks! So who is this guy (gal?), and where do we send the fruit basket? This is totally what we need. I wish i had the talent to do stuff like this, but alas, my process is too fine-grain. I know good presentations when I see them, but I don't know where to start writing them. But if we can get him/her in a one-on-one chat, we can supply enough ideas to keep him/her going indefinitely. Like I keep saying, this is all starting to come together. The coolest thing about it is that it is tangible — you can GET it. Existing science is obtuse, dark, and mysterious. What we're doing is accessible, and it makes you feel like you're connected to the cosmos, like you can now embrace the Universe as your home, because it has become clear to you. With high-quality videos of these ideas, the message will hit home. So Mr. Current, whoever you are, bravo!
I am not too sure who the person is, I think though they wish to remain anonymous which is preferable. I trust his/her intentions are of steering humanity towards a large scale "self-examination", to be most preferable.
If whoever it is wishes to expose who they are, Mr. Current, please do so to people who are much more developed in their interpersonal and diplomatic skills. I, myself, am more of a giant lava pit, not very friendly and hot and violent. I tend to burn people. People like Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss have already been thrown in the pit. They are turds compared to Mr. Crothers.
JeffreyW
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
Mr. Current,
For what its worth, we all must understand that we are up against a very powerful undertone of delusion and obedience among our counterparts which are educated inside of the system, people trained to trust their teachers who are never told there are alternatives to Big Bang Creationism.
Lloyd
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
I looked through the list of Telluric Current's video titles and I get the impression that "he" may be Troy McLachlan who has the website, http://saturndeathcult.com. He authored a book recently with Ted Holden. So, you may be able to reach Troy on his site or via Ted. You can PM or email Ted via his posts. His most recent one seems to be at http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=15093.
JeffreyW
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
Lloyd wrote: I looked through the list of Telluric Current's video titles and I get the impression that "he" may be Troy McLachlan who has the website, http://saturndeathcult.com. He authored a book recently with Ted Holden. So, you may be able to reach Troy on his site or via Ted. You can PM or email Ted via his posts. His most recent one seems to be at http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=15093.
Thank you for sharing Lloyd. Regardless of who it is, I am glad that they are keeping open minds towards new ideas and I am very thankful for their participation during this revolution. Increasing exposure to alternatives where the establishment has failed is essential now.
Lloyd
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
This is one of the videos on Telluric Current's Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn_lFYUTE88. It's mostly Bob Johnson's speech on the Plasmoid Sun model vs. the Electric Sun.
Real or Virtual Solar Imagery? But the first 2 minutes and about 40 seconds has some very interesting video of the Sun and a comet. I can't tell if the video there is real or virtual imagery. Can anyone tell me which it is? The arcades/coronal-loops are especially interesting. Which term is correct? I think an arcade is shown with one foot in a sunspot. A couple of pairs of arcades are shown side-by-side behaving rather oddly and kind of in synchrony. Toward the end of the 2.5 minutes an arcade is shown with lots of liquid falling off toward the tops of the loops. I think we're mostly agreed that the liquid is iron plasma. Right? I hope someone can tell me if those images or real or virtual.
JeffreyW
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
Lloyd wrote: This is one of the videos on Telluric Current's Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn_lFYUTE88. It's mostly Bob Johnson's speech on the Plasmoid Sun model vs. the Electric Sun.
Real or Virtual Solar Imagery? But the first 2 minutes and about 40 seconds has some very interesting video of the Sun and a comet. I can't tell if the video there is real or virtual imagery. Can anyone tell me which it is? The arcades/coronal-loops are especially interesting. Which term is correct? I think an arcade is shown with one foot in a sunspot. A couple of pairs of arcades are shown side-by-side behaving rather oddly and kind of in synchrony. Toward the end of the 2.5 minutes an arcade is shown with lots of liquid falling off toward the tops of the loops. I think we're mostly agreed that the liquid is iron plasma. Right? I hope someone can tell me if those images or real or virtual.
I think the video is excellent virtual imagery.
Well, I'm not too sure if the "liquid is iron plasma". I'd consider (newly) that plasma can behave like a liquid in very large quantities, (this is still very new to me) but I'd consider that with the Sun, it is comprised of all naturally occurring elements, so when we are looking at it, we should rather view events as containing all elements and their properties determining the behavior of the events as well. As to which elements we are looking at at different parts is still very confusing to me. One thing is for sure, they are all over the place, the Sun isn't just helium and hydrogen, its ALL elements.
I think what is frustrating is that the elements they found, 67 of them according to this page:
All were found in the solar spectrum. I find it really strange how the Sun is supposed to be this "nuclear reactor with a nuclear core fusing hydrogen to make helium", yet the outer areas of the Sun are mostly helium and hydrogen! Somebody needs to tell the hydrogen and helium to move back into the core so that the Sun can sustain its nuclear reactions!! What is most disconcerting is that helium and hydrogen are actually experimentally verified to move to the outside of a plasma, this is called Marklund Convection. So literally if we see a plasma and we see lots of hydrogen and helium, we can be guaranteed that its because that is ALL the hydrogen and helium and there is none in the supposed "core". Thus there is no central fusion reactor, its just a made up thing! Gosh, so many problems!!!
The second point I want to drive home with this theory is that the Sun's future is predicted by observing the many millions of orange stars and then red dwarfs that exist. We could study their spectrums in depth to get a hand of what will happen to the Sun. Unfortunately the helium and hydrogen will always remain on the outside of the star as it evolves because of Marklund Convection, unless to lose energy it combines with other elements in the vicinity like oxygen, making water of course, which then would "rain" into the star causing to further cool and die. ugh.
CharlesChandler
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
The coronal loops starting at 1:51 are real. This occurred 2012-07-19, immediately following a flare and a CME.
I'm betting that the same phenomenon is mirrored inside of the interior. The magnetic loop is on the other side of the surface as well, as I think the Sun is a hollow shell.
There is no evidence that suns die. There is no logical reasoning that suns become planets. There is no basis for the gtsm hypothesis, none at all in the critical mind. That other theories do not work and the community in control of standard theory are wrong and sometimes deceptive, does in no way lead credence to gtsm!
"There it is the foundation of the Universe. My question is, based on stellarmetimophosis after a star is born and starts morphing into a planet as it coalesses to become a dead star. Are we the human race going through the same process, degrading and dying. This could explain a lot about the technologicly advanced ancient humans."
I wouldn't consider us to be degrading and dying. We are evolving. It is my understanding that our technology is improving significantly, In stellar metamorphosis stars evolve into what are called "planets". So in other words the star is the new planet, and the planet is the ancient (more evolved) star. Only the old mature stars like Earth and Kepler 138c, can host life, stars like the Sun and Bellatrix are way too young and hot.
Life evolves on the star as the star evolves, thus life itself is a direct result of the evolution of a star into a life hosting star mislabeled "planet".
CharlesChandler
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
Sparky wrote: There is no logical reasoning that suns become planets.
Then let's take a step back. Somehow planets come into existence. Would you care to venture an opinion on how?
Aardwolf
Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis
So are all of the objects on the following list ex-stars?
This is totally what we need. I wish i had the talent to do stuff like this, but alas, my process is too fine-grain. I know good presentations when I see them, but I don't know where to start writing them.
