Brant said:
I like the idea of a paper... For what we are doing it would almost be considered a review of solar model with the addition of new ones...

I totally agree. I think that what I've been doing with the Individual Models and Tabular Comparison documents could grow into a formal review paper, and this would be extremely useful, for all of us. I'm thinking that each model should get a page or two to describe the essential tenets, including images where appropriate, so that the models are fairly represented. Weaknesses should be detailed in an objective tone. As new models emerge and/or change, the review paper should be updated.