|
|
|
  Observations
© Science Admins
"If mercury is cooled below 4.1 K, it loses all electric resistance. This discovery of superconductivity by H. Kammerlingh Onnes in 1911 was followed by the observation of other metals which exhibit zero resistivity below a certain critical temperature. The fact that the resistance is zero has been demonstrated by sustaining currents in superconducting lead rings for many years with no measurable reduction. An induced current in an ordinary metal ring would decay rapidly from the dissipation of ordinary resistance, but superconducting rings had exhibited a decay constant of over a billion years!"
Miscellaneous:
- Outer space is really cold. 4.2 Kelvin. Am I mistaken?
- Establishment science has vacuum being electrically resistive.
- 4.2 kelvin would be where hydrogen is superconducting, as it is the most abundant element in our galaxy...
- Outer space must be superconducting, not electrically resistive. It appears to be electrically resistive, but...
- Would not zero electrical resistance resemble almost perfect resistance? (incredibly important, yet most scientists just brush this away as if nothing of value could come of that question).
- What would entail a superconductive vacuum? What if vacuum IS superconductive matter? What if vacuum IS matter itself and outer space IS the real matter? And that negative pressure of vacuum causes gravitation? I wrote a paper on this: http://vixra.org/pdf/1302.0062v1.pdf
- I mean, does not the concept of "empty space" bother you? How can there be completely empty space and then not empty space next to it? Wouldn't Ockham's razor mean that either A. Its all empty space, or B. Its all full of matter?
- Which appearances are the most productive for future research? The assumption that empty vacuum IS empty vacuum or the assumption that empty vacuum is full of matter? (if only in a different state of existence as opposed to plasma/gas/liquid/solid?)
|
