© Lloyd, Charles Chandler

 

THIS CITY IS DROWNED DEEP!
http://www.world-mysteries.com/jgray.htm

A CITY 6,000 FEET UNDER THE SEA!

The Swedish research ship "Albatross" had just returned from a peaceful reconnaissance in the South Atlantic.

"we were sounding the seabed 700 miles east of Brazil. And we brought up core samples of fresh-water plants! Can you believe that! And do you know how deep they were? Three thousand metres!"

The speaker was Professor Hans Pettersson, who had led the expedition.

And he added: "These samples actually contained micro-organisms, twigs, plants and even tree bark."

ANOTHER DISCOVERY

Coral had been recovered from depths of over 3,000 feet (1,000 metres) in mid-Atlantic Ocean sites. Now we all know that coral grows only close to sea level.

So in London, England, someone [said]: "Either the seabed dropped thousands of feet or the sea rose mightily."

AND STILL ANOTHER

at Columbia University in the U.S.A., Professor Maurice Ewing, a prominent marine geologist, was reporting on an expedition that had descended to submerged plateaus at a depth of 5,000 feet.

"At 5,000 feet down, they discovered prehistoric beach sand. It was brought up in one case from a depth of nearly three and one half miles, far from any place where beaches exist today.

"One deposit was 1,200 miles from the nearest land."

As we all know, sandy beaches form from waves breaking on the edge of the coastal rim of the seas. Beach sand does not form deep down on the ocean bottom.

Then Ewing dropped his bombshell: "Either the land must have sunk 2 or 3 miles or the sea must have been 2 or 3 miles lower than now. Either conclusion is startling."

WHAT THIS MEANS

These facts mean one of two things: either there was a mighty ocean bed subsidence (unexplainable by orthodox science), or else a huge (likewise unexplained) addition of water to the ocean.

Let's briefly consider these.
1. Sudden subsidence

Much of the landscape that is now drowned by the ocean still has sharp, fine profiles. But these sharp, fine profiles would have been eroded, and the lava covering the ocean floor would have decayed if all this rocky terrain had been immersed in sea water for more than 15,000 years.

You see, chemical and mechanical forces are very destructive. Sharp edges and points can be ground down and blunted by abrasion, erosion, and the action of waves.

But the entire seabed below the present surf zone has retained its sharpness of profile. Had the subsidence taken place gradually, chemical and other forces would have ground down this sharp profile within a few hundred years.

If the land had sunk slowly, even the surf would have worn away these profiles. No, it was a rapid subsidence, if a subsidence it was.

This sudden collapse of an area covering many millions of square miles does not support a gradual sinking, but rather a cataclysmic event.

Such subsidence is perfectly in keeping with the centuries-long adjustments that occurred after the Great Flood trauma.
2. Pre-Flood sea level lower

However, some of the data strongly suggest that the sea level actually was several thousand feet lower than at present - that there was LESS WATER in the ocean at one time. These discoveries suggest that we are uncovering evidence of a former sea level!

But this would call for a relatively sudden increase of 30 percent in the volume of the ocean. The compelling question is, WHERE DID THIS WATER COME FROM? Few geologists can bring themselves to answer this.

Obviously, melting ice sheets could never have contained enough water to raise the ocean level thousands of feet. So we can forget melting ice sheets being the cause.

CITY ON THE SEABED?

Now for another surprise. This time the excitement was in the Pacific. The year was 1965. A research vessel named "Anton Brunn" was investigating the Nazca Trench, off Peru.

At a depth of 6,000 feet a photograph revealed huge upright pillars and walls, some of which seemed to have writing on them. In other nearby locations, apparently artificially shaped stones lay on their sides, as though they had toppled over.

The crew rubbed their eyes and kept staring. Could this really be? ...the remains of a city under a mass of water more than a mile deep!

Was it overwhelmed suddenly by some gigantic disaster? And now it was buried under 6,000 feet of ocean?

If you would like to know more about the world BEFORE the Great Flood, Click here >>

That lost world was like a paradise, in many ways. It was different beyond our wildest dreams. Yet it was a REAL WORLD. As real as ours.

The Killing Of... PARADISE PLANET
Secrets of that forgotten world BEFORE the great disaster

This picks up …WHERE Dead Men's Secrets LEFT OFF

Was Antarctica once a tropical paradise?
Did man really know the secret of eternal youth?
Did giant humans really stalk the planet?
Where did all the different races come from?
Is there really a carbon dating cover-up?
The astonishing truth about the ages of stalactites,
sandy beaches and canyons

Jonathan Gray
Can you explain….........HOUSES INSIDE COAL?


CAN YOU GUESS HOW THIS HAPPENED?

My head is whirling at the thought of it. Can you imagine - two miles down inside a coal mine - an ancient building!!! That's right... inside [t]he coal.

Yes, I promise you we'll get into that in a minute. But first, what do you think of these?:

Western Australia: In 1975, water drillers 80 miles from Perth struck concrete 30 feet below the surface. Investigation proved the existence of a concrete wall.
France: At Aix-en-Provence, from 1786 to 1788, coins, stumps of columns and other worked stones, were discovered 50 feet down, below eleven beds of compact limestone.
Kentucky: At Blue Lick Springs, underground, below the remains of a prehistoric mastodon, was discovered a pavement of cut-stone tiles.
Ohio: In the autumn of 1868, in a strip of coal mine operated by Captain Lucy near Hammondsville, at 100 feet below ground a large mass of coal fell into the shaft, unmasking a large, smooth, slate wall covered with inscriptions similar to hieroglyphics, in lines about three inches apart. Crowds flocked to see this marvel. By the time qualified scientists got there with proper equipment, the slate had crumbled in the air and the writing was destroyed.
Pennsylvania: In November 1829, in a quarry twelve miles northwest of Philadelphia, at a depth of 69-70 feet below ground, a block of marble was found, which bore an indentation containing the raised alphabet characters 'I' and 'U'.' The discovery was authenticated by several reliable witnesses and two years later an illustration appeared in the American Journal of Science, vol.19, p.361.
Omaha, Nebraska: About 130 feet underground, coalminers found a carved slab of rock. The marks on it divided the shape into diamonds. In the centre of each diamond was an engraving of a human face. The earth had not been disturbed - and the coal was dated at 300 million years. (Omaha Daily News, 1897)

All right, here is what I promised you... TWO MILES UNDER - COVERED IN COAL!
Oklahoma: In 1928, in coal mine No. 5, near Heavener, at a depth of two miles, miners encountered a wall composed of 12 inch cube concrete blocks. The blocks were so smooth and polished on the outside that all six sides acted as mirrors. A solid wall was exposed. About 100 to 150 yards further down the shaft, the same wall or one very similar was uncovered.

EVIDENCE THEN BURIED

When they reported the discovery to the mining officers, the men were pulled out of that mine and sent to another mine. That part of the mine was then filled up.

Hey, what's going on here? Who's afraid these things will get known?

OLDER OR YOUNGER?

There are just two ways you can understand this:

EITHER civilized man (the grand finale of so-called evolution) was on earth BEFORE the "coal age" (up to 300 million years ago)
OR coal was NOT laid down 300 million years ago, but very recently, after civilized man.