I fixed the sloppy pick-point thing, so now you'll get what you pick, to within a pixel or two. This will save the manual tweaking that you and I have been doing. :) (In the process I let a test outlook slip past the deadline, so I got a really bad score on that one — d'oh!) I still haven't fixed the Unisys maps, but you said that wasn't an issue for you. I like seeing the outlook poly on the various maps, but I know what you're saying about there being better maps elsewhere, so just seeing 300mb/850mb/Lift info isn't the whole story. Anyway, I use them, so eventually I'll get that straightened out.

 

I was thinking about overlooking tornadoes more than 1500 miles away, or something like that. The reasoning there would be that a tornado that far away was definitely part of a different system. Since you can only define one outlook poly, you should only be scored on the basis of how much activity occurred as a result of the one system that you studied. Anyway, I'll think about it some more.