F = H + E

Okay. I misunderstood your model initially. I was assuming that the higher photon density from Saturn, when Earth, Venus and Mars trailed behind it, would have increased the mass and the gravity of the 3 planets. But I read a Mathis paper on Weight yesterday, which said F = H + E, where F is the total force and H is gravity force, which stays the same, if the radius stays the same, and E is the E/M force, which opposes H and thus reduces F. That, along with your explanation of the photon density (E/M field) coming from Earth's recycled emission of the Saturnian E/M field, seems to clear up your model for me, which model is about the same as Mathis' from his Weight paper.

Planetary Orientation

I thought Mathis' papers on planet axis tilts made sense, but it's hard for me to believe offhand that planets emit mainly equatorially and receive photons mainly polarly, because it doesn't look like there's any difference in emission and I think it's more likely that ions cool the poles than that photons do.

If that model is correct, then in order for Mars, Venus and Saturn to have been above Earth's north pole, as ancient myths portray them, what orientations would the other 3 planets have had? Earth would have been oriented similar to Uranus' present tilt.

What would be the easiest way to measure or calculate Earth's photon emission and reception? Could the emission be calculated by estimating the weight or mass of the atmosphere or ionosphere and calculating how much emission would be needed to balance that mass? Shouldn't there be holes in the atmosphere and ionosphere at the poles where photons are entering instead of emitting?