Lloyd said:Can you get an idea from this what it would be like having these statements in separate folders versus getting separate readouts.Here's how that would look using QDL features:
Each statement is its own post. I'm using the lightbulb icon for ideas (i.e., assertions), the red exclamation point for problematic assertions, and the checkmark for strong assertions. There are a lot of icons to choose from, and I can add more at any time. Then, the QDL ranking feature is utilized to designate the strength, where appropriate. Note that anybody eligible to rank these items can make their selection, and then QDL displays the average. So if both you & I are eligible to rank the items, and I say it's a 7, and you say it's a 9, it will display 8. If you really want just one person setting the strengths of the items, that person controls that with the eligibility (in the metadata).
The advantage is that this gives a place inside each post for a more extensive description of the statement, and for criticisms and rebuttals (Deliberatoreum style). So the post title could be just a brief statement, while the post body could contain supporting statements, and sub-posts could contain criticisms and rebuttals.
It took me 13 minutes to do those 17 items by hand. I'd say that for large documents, if we're going to break out every single sentence, I should create a function that will automatically do this (i.e., break the text on sentence delimiters, and create the posts). Then we'd just have to go back and set the icons and the strengths.
