© Lloyd* Asterisks indicate Key statements. See following post for all statements in context. The one-digit numbers behind WA, QO, GO & SA indicate per ten, so 1 means 10%, 5 means 50%, 9 means 90% etc.
The key statements considered to be weak arguments and questionable observations are those that the author or supporters should try to address with stronger arguments or evidence.
WA = Weak Arguments
*WA1_29= The ionic content of the battery has set up not a separation of charge,
*WA1_89= The photons at the source don't match the photons at the receiver in any way, so there isn't any appreciable coupling.
*WA2_40= From it we can see that it is not photons or electrons traveling from battery to bulb that creates the energy rise in the bulb and its lighting.
*WA2_67= As we will see below, some photons are initially moving in the wire to prime the field, but this movement isn't either S or E.
*WA2_90= And this means that the wires in a wire circuit aren't really carrying charge, they are simply priming the field. _The wires supply the pre-signal.
*WA2_97= Induction is caused by photon modulation of some sort, and you can't have this modulation without some appreciable width of influence.
*WA2_98= If you had a really wide wire and a perfectly directionalized connection, you could create the induction with one wire, since in that case you would be mirroring the wireless set-up.
*WA2_15= or by directionalizing the B-field through the shape of the molecules in the substance.
*WA3_103= Following Huygens principle, we can imagine the photons fanning out, as from a point source.
*WA3_110= Induction requires a resonance, and a fan can't create this resonance.
*WA3_119= The field in the bulb can therefore be made like the field in the battery, and we have induction.
*WA3_46= Statistics tells us that all the photons in the battery will be attracted to all parts of the bulb.
*WA3_73= But even in Sefton's field model, nothing is completing the circuit.
*WA3_79= In a nutshell, in wireless transmission source and receiver have to be coupled, which means the field in the receiver has to be primed to match the source.
*WA3_83= But by sending out a pre-signal, as it were, a path is created for the photons. _A coherence in the field is created.
*WA4_10= But it will drive off larger particles more successfully than smaller particles, since the smaller particles will encounter a smaller cross-section of the field.
*WA4_106= If the field is supposed to be modulated by frequency for instance, that fanning out is changing the frequency.
*WA4_132= This means that the neutral wire is not really neutral, it is just relatively neutral.
*WA4_27= We should read the wires as an extension of the battery, not as a path.
*WA4_35= What we have done is prime the field, like what happens in wireless transmission.
*WA4_96= But why must we have two wires then. _Why doesn't one wire work to prime the field. _Because one wire doesn't allow for induction.
QO = Questionable Observations
*QO2_13a Free electrons travel at high speed in a conducting wire, or any conductor,
GO = Good Observations
*GO5_139= After the mutual induction takes place, and the fields are cohered, then E will be created.
*GO6_113= Remember that waves are basically very simple fixed patterns. _It is these waves we are modulating in some fashion to create the induction.
*GO7_138= S is the statistical linear motion of the photons, before we prime the field. _It is the linear motion before the induction and before the "circuit" is created.
*GO7_31= Why._It could be any number of reasons, but a common reason in normal batteries is that chemical reactions separate large ions from small ones.
*GO8_22= The electrons are simply moving too slow.
*GO9_121= But if that is so, then why does the induction cease when the wires are cut.
*GO9_123= In real wireless, do we continue to have transmission when the conductor is turned off. _No.
*GO9_82= The problem is, in normal conditions, the field is not coherent in any way. _It is scrambled, relative to source and receiver. _Charge photons are rushing around in every direction.
SA = Strong Arguments
*SA5_111= But if we allow even two point sources to enter the bulb simultaneously, with some separation, the local field can read the information in the new photons.
*SA5_143= 8) The wires in a simple circuit perform precisely the same field priming that a conductor does in wireless. _That is, the wires produce the initial induction, and after that, the field of the battery can pass to the receiver with or without the wires.
*SA5_144= And finally, we have learned that different substances actually create different charge. _We can deduce this just from the fact that we need induction. _If all elementary particles and atoms and molecules were emitting the same charge photons, then we wouldn't need induction.
*SA5_148= The size and shape of the emitters determine the characteristics of the charge.
*SA5_15= This B-field river can be created in any number of ways, either by having lots of radiating particles at one end of the wire and few or none at the other,
*SA5_41= It is actually photons moving across the bulb, just as they moved across the battery.
*SA5_29= but a density difference in the photon field.
*SA6_104= That fanning out ruins the ability of the photons to cohere the field inside the bulb.
*SA6_112= How. _Because the two new fans will cross. _One new influence won't create a pattern, two will.
*SA6_13b because the B-field is moving in only one direction in that substance.
*SA6_142= 7) Like everything else, electrical induction is a mechanical process. _It is photons colliding with other photons, and informing them via a resonance; just as one river entering a larger river will be informed by that river (as a matter of speed, say).
*SA6_47= But since density is spatial, it matters where the terminals are located in space.
*SA6_74= If this is the case, we must explain why we even need to complete the loop with the second wire.
*SA7_48= As the photons move over to the bulb, they naturally "drag" their old densities with them, simply because more photons will be coming from the denser areas.
*SA7_53= You should find it interesting that current theory uses density here, since I am defining the entire circuit, at the fundamental level, as an outcome of photon density variation.
*SA7_69= And yes, electrons may be caused to drift by collisions with these passing photons, but, as Sefton just proved, E cannot be this movement of the electrons, since it is too slow.
*SA7_84= When this field reaches the receiver, the E/M field surrounding the atoms there is also made coherent.
*SA8_124= The reason for this is that the ambient field rushes back in in both cases, rescrambling the paths.
*SA8_14= The B-field acts as a river, moving the electrons along by direct contact.
*SA8_140= 5) Anytime you have information that moves at the speed of light, you should assume you have photons involved, not electrons.
*SA8_70= The drift of electrons is just a side effect.
*SA8_76= A related question is why we need the wires at all.
*SA8_85= This coherence can be a coherence of frequency or it can be a coherence of spin (magnetism), or both.
P = Predictions
*P_148= This means that we might create induction, or maximize it, by making our receivers out of the same material as our emitters.